One of the recurring themes of Statecraft has been that it’s really easy to get policy wrong. Government work is just hard — as Dean Ball said recently about work in the White House, it can be like trying to dig through the hull of a container ship with a butter knife. It’s especially easy to get policy wrong if you fixate on the wrong metrics. We talked about this with DOGE: how if you do it wrong, slashing headcount increases bureaucratic bloat and government lethargy. If you have fewer people administering the same regulatory process, the burden on the private actors being regulated actually grows. As a policymaker, your ambition and drive don’t matter if you don’t have your arms around the nature of the problem.
This afternoon, I’ve got a new op-ed in City Journal with my colleague at IFP, Jeremy Neufeld. It’s called “Trump’s H-1B Changes Won’t Work,” and in it, we try and flesh out why exactly the recent spate of changes to the H-1B visa program won’t fix the problems critics identify with the H-1B. Those critics are right to say the H-1B needs reform, and they’re pointing to real problems with the existing system. But (we argue) that’s exactly why you need to think hard about policy implementation, and the second-order effects of changing a policy. Otherwise, you can end up doing precisely the opposite of what you intend.
Case in point: The administration has made a set of regulatory moves to get higher-skilled talent into the H-1B lottery. But the moves likely won’t do that. And, according to new research from the IFP immigration team, they will likely lead to even more visas going to the scammy Indian outsourcing companies that the right has correctly identified as abusers of the process.
That’s because the new regulation uses an arcane Department of Labor system for identifying the “wage level” of an H-1B applicant, and wage levels are only loosely correlated to the actual wages being offered to that applicant. If that seems bizarre to you, it really is. Read the piece!
As a bonus, here’s the admin’s wage level proposal, vs. what would happen if you just allocated H-1Bs to the applicants being offered the highest compensation.
Can someone explain why the Indian outsourcers are "scammy"? I get the argument that they abuse the H-1B visa by appropriating it for purposes different from what the government intended. I understand the Biden admin also changed the rules so you can't take multiple shots at the lottery, which they were previously doing. But are they not bonafide businesses providing bonafide services to bonafide customers? In what sense are they a *scam*?
Though H-1B provides great economic benefit to the US economy, it's unfortunately tied up public perception as part of the immigration problem. For Trump it's good PR, demonstrating his resolve to fight for the little guy. In this case American don't have the skills to fill all of the high-tech jobs.